10% OFF FIRST-TIME ORDERS. PROMO: BONUS10. FREE SHIPPING for EMF METER.

0

Your Cart is Empty

EMFs and Impact to Health Research

EMFs and Health Research

Somavedic Science-based Certifications and Studies



Certified to Reduce the Negative Cellular Effects of Mobile Phone Radiation

This test shows that cell regeneration/wound healing of connective tissue fibroblasts and activity of functional neutrophils as the first defense of the innate immune system against invading microbial pathogens are significantly decreased by mobile phone radiation.

The use of the Somavedic Amber was able to attenuate these unwanted effects.


Certified to Protect against Cell Phone Radiation

Based on positive test results of the protective influence of the Somavedic Medic Green Ultra against cell phone radiation, the Bion Institute has awarded the Bion Certificate of approval to the Somavedic Medic Green Ultra.


Certified to Protect against Wireless Router Radiation

Based on positive results of the testing, protective influence of the product Somavedic Medic Green Ultra on human organism against wireless router radiation met all the criteria required to obtain the Bion certificate.



EMFs and Impact to Health Research
Oxidative Stress/Free Radical Damage is the Mechanism of Harm from Wireless Non-ionizing Radiation  
  1. Manmade Electromagnetic Fields and Oxidative Stress—Biological Effects and Consequences for Health. (2021) Scheurmann D and Mevissen M.  Int J Mol Sci.2021 Apr; 22(7): 3772. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8038719/
  2. Continuous Exposure to 1.7 GHz LTE Electromagnetic Fields Increases Intracellular Reactive Oxygen Species to Decrease Human Cell Proliferation and Induce Senescence. (2020) Choi J et al. Sci Rep. 2020 Jun 8;10(1):9238. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32514068/
  3. Oxidative stress associated with long term occupational exposure to extremely low frequency electric and magnetic fields. (2020) Hosseinabadi MB. Work.  2020 Sep 6. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32925155/
  4. Reactive Oxygen Species: Potential Regulatory Molecules in Response to Hypomagnetic Field Exposure. (2020) Zhang B et al. Bioelectromagnetics. 2020 Sep 30. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32997824/
  5. Effects of a Single Head Exposure to GSM-1800 MHz Signals on the Transcriptome Profile in the Rat Cerebral Cortex: Enhanced Gene Responses Under Proinflammatory Conditions. (2020) Lameth J et al. Neurotox Res. 2020 Mar 21. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32200527
  6. Effect of electromagnetic radiation on redox status, acetylcholine esterase activity and cellular damage contributing to the diminution of the brain working memory in rats. (2020) Sharma S et al. J Chem Neuroanat. 2020 Mar 20:101784. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32205214/
  7. Assessment of electromagnetic fields, vibration and sound exposure effects from multiple transceiver mobile phones on oxidative stress levels in serum, brain and heart tissue. (2020) Usman JD et al. Scientific African. Vol 7. March 2020. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468227620300090
  8. Impact of Cerebral Radiofrequency Exposures on Oxidative Stress and Corticosterone in a Rat Model of Alzheimer’s Disease. Bouji M et al. J Alzheimer’s Disease. 2020;73(2):467-476. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31796670/
  9. Effect of 900-, 1800-, and 2100-MHz radiofrequency radiation on DNA and oxidative stress in brain. (2019) Alkis ME et al. Electromagn Biol Med. 2019;38(1):32-47. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30669883
  10. Aluminium foil dampened the adverse effect of 2100 MHz mobile phone-induced radiation on the blood parameters and myocardium in rats. (2019) Kalanjati VP.  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int.  2019. Apr;26(12):11686-11689. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30806932
  11. Oxidative stress response in SH-SY5Y cells exposed to short-term 1800 MHz radiofrequency radiation.  (2018) Cermak M et al. J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng 2018;53:132-138. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29148897
  12. Evidence of oxidative stress after continuous exposure to Wi-Fi radiation in rat model. (2018)
    Kamali K et al. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018 Dec;25(35):35396-35403.
    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30343375/
  13. Role of Mitochondria in the Oxidative Stress Induced by Electromagnetic Fields: Focus on Reproductive Systems. (2018) Santini SJ et al. . Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2018 Nov 8;2018. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30533171
  14. Effects of electromagnetic fields exposure on the antioxidant defense system. (2017)  Kıvrak EG et al.  J Microsc Ultrastruct. 2017 Oct-Dec;5(4):167-176. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30023251
  15. Oxidative mechanisms of biological activity of low-intensity radiofrequency radiation. (2016) Yakymenko et al. Electromagn Biol Med. 2016;35(2):186-202. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26151230
  16. Oxidative stress response in SH-SY5Y cells exposed to short-term 1800 MHz radiofrequency radiation.  (2018) Cermak M et al. J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng 2018;53:132-138. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29148897
  17. Effects of electromagnetic fields exposure on the antioxidant defense system. (2017)  Kıvrak EG et al.  J Microsc Ultrastruct. 2017 Oct-Dec;5(4):167-176. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30023251
  18. Oxidative mechanisms of biological activity of low-intensity radiofrequency radiation. (2016) Yakymenko et al. Electromagn Biol Med. 2016;35(2):186-202. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2615123
  19. Long-term exposure to electromagnetic radiation from mobile phones and Wi-Fi devices decreases plasma prolactin, progesterone, and estrogen levels but increases uterine oxidative stress in pregnant rats and their offspring. (2016) Yüksel M. 2016 May;52(2):352-62.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26578367
  20. Reliable disease biomarkers characterizing and identifying electrohypersensitivity and multiple chemical sensitivity as two etiopathogenic aspects of a unique pathological disorder. (2015) Belpomme D.  Rev Environ Health. 2015;30(4):251-71. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26613326
  21. Oxidative stress of brain and liver is increased by Wi-Fi (2.45GHz) exposure of rats during pregnancy and the development of newborns. (2015) Çelik Ö et al. J Chem Neuroanat. 2015 Oct 28. pii: S0891-0618(15)00074-5. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26520617/
  22. Impacts of exposure to 900 MHz mobile phone radiation on liver function in rats. (2015) Ma HR , Zhongguo Ying Yong Sheng Li Xue Za Zhi. 2015 Nov;31(6):567-71. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27215026
  23. Effect of exposure and withdrawal of 900-MHz-electromagnetic waves on brain, kidney and liver oxidative stress and some biochemical parameters in male rats. (2015) Ragy MM. Electromagn Biol Med. 2015;34(4):279-84. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24712749
  24. Evaluation of oxidant stress and antioxidant defense in discrete brain regions of rats exposed to 900 MHz radiation. (2014) Bratisl Lek Listy 2014;115(5):260-6. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25174055
  25. Influence of non ionizing radiation of base stations on the activity of redox proteins in bovines. (2014) Hassig M et al. BMC Vet Research. 2014 Jun 19;10:136. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24946856/
  26. Reactive oxygen species elevation and recovery in Drosophila bodies and ovaries following short-term and long-term exposure to DECT base EMF. (2014) Manta AK. Electromagn Biol Med. 2014 Jun;33(2):118-31. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23781995
  27. 45-GHz microwave irradiation adversely affects reproductive function in male mouse, Mus musculus by inducing oxidative and nitrosative stress. (2014) Shahin S. Free Radic Res. 2014 May;48(5):511-25. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24490664
  28. Spin Biochemistry Modulates Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) Production by Radio Frequency Magnetic Fields. (2014) Usselman RJ et al.  Plos One. March 28, 2014.   http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0093065
  29. The Main Approaches of Studying the Mechanisms of Action of Artificial Electromagnetic Fields on Cell. (2014) Yuriy Shckorbatov. Journal of Electronics and Electronic Systems. March 7, 2014. https://www.omicsgroup.org/journals/the-main-approaches-of-studying-the-mechanisms-of-action-of-artificial-electromagnetic-fields-on-cell-2332-0796-3-123.php?aid=24328
  30. Modulation of wireless (2.45 GHz)-induced oxidative toxicity in laryngotracheal mucosa of rat by melatonin. Aynali G. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2013 May;270(5):1695-700. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23479077
  31. Effects of olive leave extract on metabolic disorders and oxidative stress induced by 2.45 GHz WIFI signals. (2013) Salah MB. Environ Toxic Pharmacol. 2013 Nov;36(3):826-34. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23994945
  32. Effect of 900 MHz radiofrequency radiation on oxidative stress in rat brain and serum. (2013) Bilgici B. Electromagn Biol Med. 2013 Mar;32(1):20-9. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23301880
  33. Cell phone radiation exposure on brain and associated biological systems. (2013) Kesari KK. Indian J Exp Biol. 2013 Mar;51(3):187-200. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23678539
  34. Recent reports of Wi-Fi and mobile phone-induced radiation on oxidative stress and reproductive signaling pathways in females and males. (2013) Nazıroğlu M. J Membr Biol. 2013 Dec;246(12):869-75. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24105626
  35. Electromagnetic fields act via activation of voltage-gated calcium channels to produce beneficial or adverse effects. (2013) Pall,ML. J Cell Mol Med. 2013 Aug;17(8):958-65. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23802593
  36. Protective effects of B-glucan against oxidative injury induced by 2.4 GHz electromagnetic radiation in the skin tissue of rats. (2012) Ceyhan AM et al..Arch Dermatol Res. 2012 Sep;304(7):521-7. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22237725/
  37. Electromagnetic Fields, Oxidative Stress, and Neurodegeneration. (2012) Claudia Consales. International Journal of Cell Biology. Volume 2012 (2012). Article ID 683897. https://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijcb/2012/683897/
  38. Biological indicators in response to radiofrequency/microwave exposure. (2012) Marjanović AM. Arh Hig Rada Toksikol. 2012 Sep;63(3):407-16. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23152390
  39. Effects of a 900-MHz electromagnetic field on oxidative stress parameters in rat lymphoid organs, polymorphonuclear leukocytes and plasma. (2011) Aydin B, Akar A. Arch Med Res. 2011;42:261–7. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21820603
  40. 900 MHz pulse-modulated radiofrequency radiation induces oxidative stress on heart, lung, testis and liver tissues. (2011) Esmekaya MA, Ozer C, Seyhan N. Gen Physiol Biophys. 2011;30:84–9. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21460416
  41. Assessment of cytogenetic damage and oxidative stress in personnel occupationally exposed to the pulsed microwave radiation of marine radar equipment. (2011) Garaj-Vrhovac V, Gajski G, Pažanin S, et al. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2011;214:59–65. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20833106
  42. Metabolic changes in cells under electromagnetic radiation of mobile communication systems. (2011) Iakimenko IL. Ukr Biokhim Zh. 2011;83:20–8. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21851043
  43. 900-MHz microwave radiation promotes oxidation in rat brain. (2011) Kesari KK, Kumar S, Behari J. Electromagn Biol Med. 2011 Dec;30(4):219-34. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22047460
  44. Autoimmune processes after long-term low-level exposure to electromagnetic fields part 4. Oxidative intracellular stress response to the long-term rat exposure to non-thermal RF EMF. (2010) Grigoriev YG, Mikhailov VF, Ivanov AA, et al.  2010;55:1054–8. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S0006350910060308
  45. Mutagenic response of 2.45 GHz radiation exposure on rat brain. (2010) Kesari KK, Behari J, Kumar S. Int J Radiat Biol. 2010;86:334–43. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22047460
  46. Electromagnetic fields: mechanism, cell signaling, other bioprocesses, toxicity, radicals, antioxidants and beneficial effects. (2010) Kovacic P, Somanathan R.J Recept Signal Transduct Res. 2010;30:214–26. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20509751
  47. Pathophysiology of cell phone radiation: oxidative stress and carcinogenesis with focus on the male reproductive system. (2009) Desai NR, Kesari KK, Agarwal A. Reproduct Biol Endocrinol. 2009;7:114. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-7-114. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2776019/
  48. Effects of long-term exposure of extremely low frequency magnetic field on oxidative/nitrosative stress in rat liver. (2008) Erdal N, Gürgül S, Tamer L, et al. J Radiat Res. 2008;49:181–7. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18367817
  49. Cell type specific redox status is responsible for diverse electromagnetic field effects. (2007) Simko, M. Curr Med Chem. 2007;14(10):1141-52. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17456027
  50. 50-Hz extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields enhance cell proliferation and DNA damage: possible involvement of a redox mechanism. (2005) Wolf FI, Torsello A, Tedesco B, et al. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2005;1743:120–9. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167488904002228
  51. EMF’s and DNA Effects: Potential Mechanism Elucidated-Science Selections .(2004) Hood E. Environmental Health Perspectives, May 2004. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1316056/
  52. Occupational exposure to electromagnetic fields and risk of Alzheimer’s disease . (2004) Qiu C. Epidemiology. 2004 Nov;15(6):687-94. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15475717
  53. Electromagnetic field exposure may cause increased production of amyloid beta and eventually lead to Alzheimer’s disease. (1996)   Sobel and Z. Davanipour.Neurology , vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 1594–1600, 1996. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8960756
Neurodegenerative Effects of EMF Radiofrequency Radiation
  1. Effect of electromagnetic radiation on redox status, acetylcholine esterase activity and cellular damage contributing to the diminution of the brain working memory in rats.(2020) Sharma S et al. J Chem Neuroanat. 2020 Mar 20:101784. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32205214/
  2. Impact of Cerebral Radiofrequency Exposures on Oxidative Stress and Corticosterone in a Rat Model of Alzheimer’s Disease. Bouji M et al. J Alzheimer’s Disease. 2020;73(2):467-476. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31796670/
  3. Are rises in Electro-Magnetic Field in the human environment, interacting with multiple environmental pollutions, the tripping point for increases in neurological deaths in the Western World? (2019) Pritchard C et al. Medical Hypothesis. Volume 127. June 2019. Pages 76-83. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306987719300040?fbclid=IwAR3N9av6NzSVGUFSkgtLBS0yYZb_9tpgVs7aOojSLxqozM5ko3Qh9-7x3tQ
  4.  A Prospective Cohort Study of Adolescents’ Memory Performance and Individual Brain Dose of Microwave Radiation from Wireless Communication. (2018) Forster M et al. Environ Health Perspect. 2018 Jul 23;126(7):077007.  https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6108834/
  5. Microwaves and Alzheimer’s disease. (2016) Xia Zhang, Wen-Juan Huang, and Wei-Wei Chen. Exp Ther Med. 2016 Oct; 12(4): 1969–1972. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5038365/
  6. Effects of 2.4 GHz radiofrequency radiation emitted from Wi-Fi equipment on microRNA expression in brain tissue. (2015) Suleyman Dasdag. International Journal of Radiation Biology, July 2015; 91(7): 555–561. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25775055
  7. Epigenetically regulated microRNAs in Alzheimer’s disease. (2014) Van den Hove, D.L., Kompotis, K., Lardenoije, R., Kenis, G., Mill, J., Steinbusch, H.W, Rutten, B.P.F. Neurobiology of Aging, 35(4), 731– 745. (2014). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/258634112_Epigenetically_regulated_microRNAs_in_Alzheimer%27s_disease
  8. Epigenetic dysregulation in Alzheimer’s disease: Cause or consequence? (2014) Daniel Louis Albert Van den Hove. Epigenomics 17 6(1):9-11. 21 February 2014. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/260441040_Epigenetic_dysregulation_in_Alzheimer’s_disease_Cause_or_consequence
  9. Electromagnetic Fields, Oxidative Stress, and Neurodegeneration.(2010) Claudia Consales. International Journal of Cell Biology. Volume 2012 (2012). Article ID 683897. https://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijcb/2012/683897/
  10. Long-term exposure to magnetic fields and the risks of Alzheimer’s disease and breast cancer: Further biological research. (2009) Davanipour Z and  Sobel E.   Pathophysiology. 2009, Vol 16:149-156. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19278839
  11. Residence Near Power Lines and Mortality from Neurodegenerative Diseases: Longitudinal Study of the Swiss Population. (2009) Huss et al.American Journal of Epidemiology, Volume 169, Issue 2, 15 January 2009. https://academic.oup.com/aje/article/169/2/167/95445/Residence-Near-Power-Lines-and-Mortality-From
  12. Cell type specific redox status is responsible for diverse electromagnetic field effects. (2007) Simkó M. Curr Med Chem. 2007;14:1141–52. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17456027
  13. Occupational exposure to electromagnetic fields and risk of Alzheimer’s disease. (2004)  Qiu C. Epidemiology. 2004 Nov;15(6):687-94.  https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15475717
  14. Electromagnetic field exposure may cause increased production of amyloid beta and eventually lead to Alzheimer’s disease. (1996)  E. Sobel and Z. Davanipour.Neurology, vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 1594–1600, 1996. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8960756
Cancer and EMF RFR Radiation Research
  1. Radiofrequency EMF irradiation effects on pre-B lymphocytes undergoing somatic recombination. (2021) Ionita E et al. Nature. Scientific Reports. 1, Article number: 12651 (2021) https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-91790-3
  2. Aspects on the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) 2020 Guidelines on Radiofrequency Radiation. (2021) Hardell L et al. J Cancer Sci Clin Ther 2021; 5 (2): 250-285. https://www.fortunejournals.com/articles/aspects-on-the-international-commission-on-nonionizing-radiation-protection-icnirp-2020-guidelines-on-radiofrequency-radiation.pdf
  3. Lost opportunities for cancer prevention: historical evidence on early warnings with emphasis on radiofrequency radiation. (2021) Lennart Hardell and Michael Carlberg.  Reviews on Environmental Health. 2021, Feb 15. https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/reveh-2020-0168/pdf  or   https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33594846/
  4. Exposure to radiofrequency radiation increases the risk of breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. (2021) Shih YW et al. Exp Ther med. 2021 Jan; 21(1): 23. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7690245/
  5. Is the Increasing Incidence of Thyroid Cancer in the Nordic Countries Caused by Use of Mobile Phones? (2020) Carlberg M et al. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17(23), 9129;  https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/23/9129  https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17239129
  6. Genetic susceptibility may modify the association between cell phone use and thyroid cancer: A population-based case-control study in Connecticut. (2020) Luo J et al. Environmental Research, Volume 182. March 2020. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0013935119308102?via%3Dihub
  7. Assessment of Genotoxicity in Human Cells Exposed to Modulated Electromagnetic Fields of Wireless Communication Devices.(2020)  Schuermann D. Genes (Basel). 2020 Mar 25;11(4). https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4425/11/4/347
  8. Extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields and cancer: How source of funding affects results. (2019) Carpenter DO. Environmental Research. 2019 Aug 24;178:108688. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31476684
  9. Risks to Health and Well-Being From Radio-Frequency Radiation Emitted by Cell Phones and Other Wireless Devices. (2019)  Miller A et al.  Front Public Health. 2019; 7: 223. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6701402/#B68
  10. Commentary on the utility of the National Toxicology Program study on cell phone radiofrequency radiation data for assessing human health risks despite unfounded criticisms aimed at minimizing the findings of adverse health effects. (2019) Melnick RL. Environmental Research. 2019 Jan;168:1-6. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30243215
  11. Chromosome Damage in Human Cells Induced by UMTS Mobile Telephony Radiation. (2019) Panagopoulos D.  Gen Physiol Biophys. 2019 Sep;38(5):445-454. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31516130/
  12. Comparing DNA damage induced by mobile telephony and other types of man-made electromagnetic fields. (2019)  Dimitri Panagopoulos. Mutation Research/Reviews in Mutation Research. March 2019. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/331661949_Comparing_DNA_Damage_Induced_by_Mobile_Telephony_and_Other_Types_of_Man-Made_Electromagnetic_Fields
  13. The carcinogenic potential of non‐ionizing radiations: The cases of S‐50 Hz MF and 1.8 GHz GSM radiofrequency radiation/ (2019) Soffritti, M. and Giuliani, L. Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bcpt.13215
  14. Health effects associated with exposure to low-frequency electromagnetic fields: Possible association between exposure to low-frequency electromagnetic fields and the long-term risk of childhood leukaemia. (2019) June 21, 2019. French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety. https://www.anses.fr/en/content/health-effects-associated-exposure-low-frequency-electromagnetic-fields
  15. Comments on the US National Toxicology Program technical reports on toxicology and carcinogenesis study in rats exposed to whole-body radiofrequency radiation at 900 MHz and in mice exposed to whole-body radiofrequency radiation at 1,900 MHz. (2018) Lennart Hardell and Michael Carlberg. International Journal of Oncology. Oct 24, 2018. Pg 111-127. https://www.spandidos-publications.com/10.3892/ijo.2018.4606
  16. The Contribution of In Vivo Mammalian Studies to the Knowledge of Adverse Effects of Radiofrequency Radiation on Human Health. (2019) Vornoli A et al.  Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Sep 12;16(18):3379. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31547363/
  17. Exposure to non-ionizing electromagnetic fields emitted from mobile phones induced DNA damage in human ear canal hair follicle cells. (2018)  Akdag M et al.  Electromagn Biol Med. 2018; 37(2):66-75. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29667447/
  18. Effect of cell-phone radiofrequency on angiogenesis and cell invasion in human head and neck cancer cells. (2018) Alahmad YM.  Head Neck. 2018 May 13. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29756334
  19. Cancer epidemiology update, following the 2011 IARC evaluation of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (Monograph 102). (2018) Miller AB et al.  Environ Res. 2018 Nov;167:673-683. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30196934
  20. Women With Hereditary Breast Cancer Predispositions Should Avoid Using Their Smartphones, Tablets, and Laptops at Night. (2018) Mortazavi SA et al. IJBMS. 2018 Feb;21(2):112-115. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29456806/
  21. Radio frequency radiation-related cancer: assessing causation in the occupational/military setting. (2018)  Peleg M. Environ Res. 2018 May;163:123-133. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29433020
  22. TOXICOLOGY AND CARCINOGENESIS STUDIES IN Hsd:SPRAGUE DAWLEY SD RATS EXPOSED TO WHOLE-BODY RADIO FREQUENCY RADIATION AT A FREQUENCY (900 MHz) AND MODULATIONS (GSM AND CDMA) USED BY CELL PHONES. (2018). National Toxicology Program, National Institute of Health (NIH). March 26-28, 2018. NTP Technical Report- TOXICOLOGY AND CARCINOGENESIS STUDIES OF GSM- AND CDMA-MODULATED CELL PHONE RADIO FREQUENCY RADIATION AT 900 MHz IN Hsd:SPRAGUE DAWLEY SD RATS 2018
  23. Positive correlation between ELF and RF electromagnetic fields on cancer risk. (2015) Mahdavi M et al. J Paramed Sci 6(3), ISSN 2008-4978. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281579026_Positive_correlation_between_ELF_and_RFelectromagnetic_fieldon_cancer_risk
  24. Mobile phone radiation causes brain tumors and should be classified as a probable human carcinogen (2A). (2015) Morgan et al. Int J Oncol 46(5): 1865-1871. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/273150433_Mobile_phone_radiation_causes_brain_tumors_and_should_be_classified_as_a_probable_human_carcinogen_2A_Review
Cardiovascular Effects of EMF Radiofrequency Radiation
  1. Risk of congenital heart disease due to exposure to common electrical appliances during early pregnancy: a case-control study. (2020) Zhao D et al. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Sep 19. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32949363/
  2. Exposure to cell phones reduces heart rate variability in both normal-weight and obese normotensive medical students. (2020) Alassiri M et al. Explore (NY). 2020 Mar 2. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32249199
  3. Assessment of electromagnetic fields, vibration and sound exposure effects from multiple transceiver mobile phones on oxidative stress levels in serum, brain and heart tissue. (2020) Usman JD et al. Scientific African. Vol 7. March 2020. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468227620300090
  4. Aluminium foil dampened the adverse effect of 2100 MHz mobile phone-induced radiation on the blood parameters and myocardium in rats. (2019) Kalanjati VP.  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int.  2019. Apr;26(12):11686-11689. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30806932
  5. Syncope Due to Ventricular Arrhythmia Triggered by Electronic Gaming.  (2019) N Engl J Med.  2019; 381:1180-118. https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMc1905537 or https://www.medpagetoday.com/cardiology/arrhythmias/82237
  6. National Toxicology Technical Report on Cell Phones and Cancer. TOXICOLOGY AND CARCINOGENESIS STUDIES IN Hsd:SPRAGUE DAWLEY SD RATS EXPOSED TO WHOLE-BODY RADIO FREQUENCY RADIATION AT A FREQUENCY (900 MHz) AND MODULATIONS (GSM AND CDMA) USED BY CELL PHONES.  March 26-28, 2018. 2 Year Study showing increased incidence of right ventricular cardiomyopathy. https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/ntp/about_ntp/trpanel/2018/march/tr595peerdraft.pdf
  7. Cardiovascular disease: Time to identify emerging environmental risk factors, (2017) Bandara P and Weller S. European Journal of Preventative Cardiology. October 3, 2017. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2047487317734898
  8. The effects of the duration of mobile phone use on heart rate variability parameters in healthy subjects. (2016) Ekici B, Tanındı A, Ekici G, Diker E. Anatol J Cardiol. 2016 Apr 7. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27109242
  9. Effects of acute exposure to WIFI signals (2.45 GHz) on heart variability and blood pressure in Albinos rabbit. (2015) Linda Saili. Environmental toxicology and Pharmacology.Vol 40. September 2015. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1382668915300594
  10. The effects of prenatal exposure to a 900-MHz electromagnetic field on the 21-day-old male rat heart. (2015) Turedi S et al. Electromagn Biol Med. 2015;34(4):390-7. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25166431
  11. Electromagnetic fields promote severe and unique vascular calcification in an animal model of ectopic calcification. (2014) Shuvy M et al. Experimental and Toxicologic Pathology: Official Journal of the Gesellschaft fur Toxikologische Pathologie: 66(7). May 2014. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/262782819_Electromagnetic_fields_promote_severe_and_unique_vascular_calcification_in_an_animal_model_of_ectopic_calcification
  12.  Replication of heart rate variability provocation study with 2.4-GHz cordless phone confirms original findings. (2013) Havas, M, Marrongelle, J. Electromag Biol Med 2013; 32: 253–266. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23675629
  13. Electromagnetic fields act via activation of voltage-gated calcium channels to produce beneficial or adverse effects. (2013) Pall, ML .  J Cell Mol Med 2013; 17: 958–965. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23802593
  14. Heart rate variability (HRV) analysis in radio and TV broadcasting stations workers. (2012) Bortkiewicz A et al.  Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2012 Sep;25(4):446-55. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23224733
  15. The influence of 1800 MHz GSM-like signals on blood chemistry and oxidative stress in non-pregnant and pregnant rabbits. (2012) Kismali G.  Int J Radiat Biol.  2012 May;88(5):414-9. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22280439
  16. The influence of the call with a mobile phone on heart rate variability parameters in healthy volunteers. (2008) Andrzejak R et al.  Ind Health. 2008 Aug;46(4):409-17. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18716391
  17. Electromagnetic fields produced by incubators influence heart rate variability in newborns.  (2008) Bellieni CV. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2008 Jul;93(4):F298-301. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18450804
  18. Cardiovascular risk in operators under radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation. (2006) Vangelova K et al. Int J Hyg Environ Health 2006; 209: 133–138. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16503299
  19. Mobile phone-induced myocardial oxidative stress: protection by a novel antioxidant agent caffeic acid phenethyl ester. (2005) Ozguner F. Toxicol Ind Health. 2005 Oct;21(9):223-30. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16342473
  20. Variations of melatonin and stress hormones under extended shifts and radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation. (2005) Vangelova KK and Israel MS. Rev Environ Health 2005; 20: 151–161. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16121836
  21. Voltage-gated calcium-channels and antiarrhythmic drug action. (2000) Cardiovascular research. Vol 45. Pg 43-51. January 2000. http://cardiovascres.oxfordjournals.org/content/45/1/43
  22. Resting blood pressure increase during exposure to a radio-frequency electromagnetic field (1998) Braune S et al. Lancet. 1998; 351: 1857–1858. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9652672.  or. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(98)24025-6/fulltext
  23. Alteration of diurnal rhythms of blood pressure and heart rate to workers exposed to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields. (1998) Szmigielski S et al.  Blood Press Monit 1998; 3: 323–330. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10212373
  24. Ambulatory ECG monitoring in workers exposed to electromagnetic fields. (1997)  Bortkiewicz A et al. J Med Eng Technol. 1997 Mar-Apr;21(2):41-6. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9131446
  25. [Evaluation of selected functional circulation parameters of workers from various occupational groups exposed to electromagnetic fields of high frequency. III. 24-h monitoring of arterial blood pressure (ABP)]. (1997)  Gadzicka E.  Med Pr. 1997;48(1):15-24. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9198713
  26. [Evaluation of selected parameters of circulatory system function in various occupational groups exposed to high frequency electromagnetic fields. II. Electrocardiographic changes]. (1996)  Bortkiewicz A et al. Med Pr. 1996;47(3):241-52. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8760508
  27. Early research on the biological effects of microwave radiation: 1940–1960. (1980) Cook HJ et al.  AJ Ann Sci 1980; 37: 323–351. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/11739945_Early_research_on_the_biological_effects_of_microwave_radiation_1940-1960
  28. Radiofrequency/microwave radiation biological effects and Safety standards: A review, Griffiss Air Force Base, New York: United States Air Force Materiel Command, 1994. Bolen SM.https://www.emfacts.com/2014/09/us-air-force-rf-review-in-1988-acknowledges-non-thermal-biological-effects/
  29. Army Intelligence- Research on Biological Effects of Radio Frequency Radiation in Eurasian Communist Countries, 1976. Adams RL and Williams RA.Army Intelligence- Research on Biological Effects of Radio Frequency Radiation in Eurasian Communist Countries, 1976.
Additional Resources

BioInitiative

SaferEMR

Environmental Health Trust

Physicians for Safe Technology